Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And here's the "executive summary" in NEJM referenced in Medscape: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1111894?query=featured_home Phil On Oct 28, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Philip Leeson wrote: > As a practicing Internist, I deal with this daily. > I'd suggest an occasional PSA in the 50's and if normal, no further > testing. > And here's an interesting condemnation of the current testing strategy; > form the discoverer of PSA, no less: > > http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/opinion/10Ablin.html > > More testing is not always better. > And oftentimes the treatment causes more problems than the underlying > disease. > > Phil > > > > On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Richard Man wrote: > >> Needs login? How about an executive summary :-)? >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at >> gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> fyi >>> >>> >>> http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/752482?sssdmh=dm1.729585&src=nldne >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information