Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: 50 Summicron-R 2 Cam conversion for R8
From: gpinkcp at msn.com (Gary Pinkerton)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:01:46 -0600
References: <CAMGHw9B0e5piL=d4mWtVgT-AVQ5bR8GwPd9ixQS-mcu5swh++A@mail.gmail.com>, <B0C40B1A-F4C4-464B-A62C-099D36E8645E@cox.net>, <ED29DA8B-1A47-4B3E-A9C4-D1E54275F1A6@aotera.org>

Sounds about right, K'mann is for sure less expensive than NJ.
And, legendary repairman, Gerry Smith still is part of the team.

> From: spencer at aotera.org
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:45:12 -0500
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: 50 Summicron-R 2 Cam conversion for R8
> 
> At one point Kindermann was handling the repairs of all the older Leica's 
> for Leica NJ as they had all the parts. If that is still the case, having 
> Kindermann handle the conversion directly would be cheaper. Probably worth 
> getting a quote from them regardless.
> 
> I think I paid about $500-$600 about a decade ago to convert 3 lens to 
> 3-cam, have 2 broken SL evaluated and have all the lens TLC'ed.
>  
> Regards,
> Spencer
> 
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 20:08, Stasys Petravicius wrote:
> 
> > Jim- I had a 135 F2.8 older lens (SL?) converted by Leica NJ years ago- 
> > if I recall it cost about $375. Expensive. Stasys
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
                                          


In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: 50 Summicron-R 2 Cam conversion for R8)
Message from stasys1 at cox.net (Stasys Petravicius) ([Leica] OT: 50 Summicron-R 2 Cam conversion for R8)
Message from spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng) ([Leica] OT: 50 Summicron-R 2 Cam conversion for R8)