Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 tests
From: rhart76 at gmail.com (Roger Hart)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:22:09 -0500
References: <CAFXnqiLguRNjxoi33NWwUkz4t7cXkdFGhYoCCCNnt_68s=Uc8w@mail.gmail.com> <p06240806cb3bd33d1ecb@192.168.1.104> <76C8D79C-D8A1-49B4-8FB4-3EEE16564807@gmail.com> <CAJ4y7gwc+rWaOSChMrvEWAdTaTiuA0WLc7V1spByeBcPhi6NYg@mail.gmail.com>

Bob,

Well, it might worth a try. You would not be disappointed.!


Roger



On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Robert Baron <robertbaron1 at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Roger, I started out shooting uncompressed with my M9 and quickly
> switched, saving file size and time. ?Also, if you are shooting both
> dng+jpg the buffer will fill up much faster; most of us I think are
> now shooting just dng.
>
> Now to the important stuff: If you could score a loaner M9 and 21mm
> Summilux, could I score a loaner 911?
>
> ;-)
>
> --Bob
>
> ==On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Roger Hart <rhart76 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the point, Herb. I was shooting uncompressed.
>>
>> Roger Hart
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:41 PM, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the delay after you took seven shots: Are you using compressed 
>>> or uncompressed DNG? I raised the question some time ago on the LUG and 
>>> everyone who responded said they could detect no difference between 
>>> compressed and uncompressed results. By compressing the DNGs, you cut in 
>>> half the file size and therefore speed up the camera's storing of the 
>>> raw data. The respondents said they compressed the DNGs for that reason, 
>>> not to save disc space.
>>>
>>> Herb
>>>
>>>
>>>> Well, I went and did it to myself this time: A simple camera test has
>>>> camera lust. I was able to get a loaner M9, along with a 21mm
>>>> Summilux, to test for a few days. With the Detroit auto show opening,
>>>> also known as the North American International Auto Show, I loaded up
>>>> the M9 to see if it is something I could live without. I've been an M8
>>>> owner and user nearly since the camera was introduced, and other than
>>>> the crop sensor, I have no problems with the camera. But the M9 has
>>>> widened my eyes a bit further...the full-frame sensor does make a
>>>> difference, and the larger files are nice to work with. My only real
>>>> issue with the camera is that I kept filling up the buffer while
>>>> shooting the cars on the stands. Seven frames and I was left waiting.
>>>> This seems way worse than in the M8...granted, the files are larger,
>>>> but it was one thing that I really didn't like about the camera. But
>>>> certainly not a deal-breaker.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a link to some photos: http://gallery.me.com/rhart76#100361
>>>>
>>>> All are shot with a 28mm Elmarit, except where noted.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Roger Hart
>>>> Detroit
>>>> USA
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>> --
>>> Herbert Kanner
>>> kanner at acm.org
>>> 650-326-8204
>>>
>>> Question authority and the authorities will question you.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] M9 tests)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 tests)
In reply to: Message from rhart76 at gmail.com (Roger Hart) ([Leica] M9 tests)
Message from rhart76 at gmail.com (Roger Hart) ([Leica] M9 tests)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] M9 tests)