Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes I was looking through some of them were you? -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:05:29 +1300 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Probably a silly question.... > > Google "35mm Summilux FLE" gets me 466,000 hits with Mr Rockwell at the > top.... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > Welli'd replied that the term FLE Is not used on the box but I'm also going > to say its not used very often at all to describe the lens by people on > chatgroups NOT on the box. Easy enough to check just search engines for > 35mm > Summilux FLE and see how many hits you get. > >> >> Shorthand for people to know the difference in model, would you rather I > said >> that a 11663 was available? >> >> john >> ________________________________________ >> >> >> FLE is Zeiss. >> You'll not find it on a Leica box nor on a lens. >> Just think of it as "Fleiss". >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information