Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Probably a silly question....
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:35:13 +1300
References: <000601ccfd12$fdafb050$f90f10f0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CB7DF340.1B4A6%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Why? I have owned and been using the lens for over a year...

john

-----Original Message-----

Yes I was looking through some of them were you?

-- 
> 
> Google "35mm Summilux FLE" gets me 466,000 hits with Mr Rockwell at the
> top....
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Welli'd replied that the term FLE Is not used on the box but I'm also
going
> to say its not used very often at all to describe the lens by people on
> chatgroups NOT on the box. Easy enough to check just search engines for
35mm
> Summilux FLE and see how many hits you get.
> 
>> 
>> Shorthand for people to know the difference in model, would you rather I
> said
>> that a 11663 was available?
>> 
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> FLE is Zeiss.
>> You'll not find it on a Leica box nor on a lens.
>> Just think of it as "Fleiss".
>> 
>> 




Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)
In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Probably a silly question....)