Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler)
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:02:20 -0700
References: <CAAsXt4MggD0Led2FwTjZQPvNnWUDzcC0wnC0yUE7skxjQAYDmA@mail.gmail.com> <002301cd15db$2bd89dd0$8389d970$@chiaroscuro.co.nz>
 
crazy...

On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:58 PM, John McMaster <john at 
chiaroscuro.co.nz>wrote:

> I have just tested my Noctilux and 75mm Summilux at closest focussing, both
> tested fine at distance. The Noctilux is spot on but the 75mm is back
> focussing ~50mm and this is after a tweak at Solms....
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> My noctilux and M9 are back to NJ for the third time. If you remember, the
> dealer sent them back 3 weeks ago because I complained it was back focusing
> and the dealer finally agreed. Dealer got it back and no change. So back
> again but "the noctilux person is on vacation until the 16th..."
> Stinks...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Bob Adler
Redwood City, CA
http://www.rgaphoto.com
Replies: Reply from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
 In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)