Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti
From: dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella)
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 20:06:54 -0400
References: <CAAsXt4MggD0Led2FwTjZQPvNnWUDzcC0wnC0yUE7skxjQAYDmA@mail.gmail.com> <002301cd15db$2bd89dd0$8389d970$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CAAsXt4MT9+P-4n+LYyzdiEgvacUUTwr9mqdj3q_g-5=RaK9A+g@mail.gmail.com>

My 75/1.4 went to NJ twice and then to Solms before they got it right...

Dante

On Apr 8, 2012, at 7:02 PM, Robert Adler wrote:

> crazy...
> 
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:58 PM, John McMaster <john at 
> chiaroscuro.co.nz>wrote:
> 
>> I have just tested my Noctilux and 75mm Summilux at closest focussing, 
>> both
>> tested fine at distance. The Noctilux is spot on but the 75mm is back
>> focussing ~50mm and this is after a tweak at Solms....
>> 
>> john
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> My noctilux and M9 are back to NJ for the third time. If you remember, the
>> dealer sent them back 3 weeks ago because I complained it was back 
>> focusing
>> and the dealer finally agreed. Dealer got it back and no change. So back
>> again but "the noctilux person is on vacation until the 16th..."
>> Stinks...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bob Adler
> Redwood City, CA
> http://www.rgaphoto.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)