Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Endgadget on the MM
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:02:57 -0700
References: <26657369.1338427776827.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9722E5312@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org>

On May 30, 2012, at 7:00 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> I guess the difference is adaptors (wobbly) or Leitax, with the latter 
> (and only way to fit to Nikon) I would expect no difference in Canon/Nikon.


but there is a difference... in the linearity of exposure compensation.


Steve



> 
> john
> ________________________________________
> 
>> 
>> Where did you hear that? There can be some issue with exposure readings 
>> but nothing wrong with focus...
>> 
> 
> At least on the high-end bodies...  on the affordable bodies mirror box 
> alignment is one of those things that's cut out to make the desired price 
> point.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)