Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Endgadget on the MM
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 02:05:52 +0000
References: <26657369.1338427776827.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9722E5312@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org>, <699FA4AA-FD16-47D9-9293-516623E91D82@gmail.com>

That was in my first reply, there are other ways of meter reading but (with 
correct exposure) there would be no difference in Nikon or Canon bodies...

john
________________________________________


On May 30, 2012, at 7:00 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> I guess the difference is adaptors (wobbly) or Leitax, with the latter 
> (and only way to fit to Nikon) I would expect no difference in Canon/Nikon.


but there is a difference... in the linearity of exposure compensation.

Steve

>
> john
> ________________________________________
>
>>
>> Where did you hear that? There can be some issue with exposure readings 
>> but nothing wrong with focus...
>>
>
> At least on the high-end bodies...  on the affordable bodies mirror box 
> alignment is one of those things that's cut out to make the desired price 
> point.
>
>


Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)