Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1
From: vondauster at earthlink.net (Will von Dauster)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:26:19 -0600
References: <59CEBDB9-E592-4332-B090-BB5B3833F8B4@comcast.net> <000001cd53b4$4506e1b0$cf14a510$@twmi.rr.com> <78518A75-FBFF-4C8C-903F-0E2337AF0B4C@comcast.net> <000601cd53e2$aff7cf60$0fe76e20$@twmi.rr.com> <1AB417DD-63AC-4A02-A017-778F778D58B9@comcast.net> <1970260656-1340750238-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-915776076-@b17.c16.bise6.blackberry> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E97F1DD40E@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <1861192350-1340756634-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2052228722-@b17.c16.bise6.blackberry> <DA9D1A11-6DD1-4903-B2ED-3CCAA7182108@gmail.com>

According to the officially released Fuji lens roadmap, a 35mm EQ (23mm) 
f1.4 will be released next year. I'm already on the list...

Will von Dauster

On Jun 26, 2012, at 6:30 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote:

> For someone who can love a rangefinder with a just a 50 mm lens, the Fuji 
> is way more viable for me than my M8. In just about every way. I hope the 
> rumors of a fast 35 mm equivalent lens pans out.
> 
> Jeffery
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> Jeffery L. Smith
> New Orleans, Louisiana
> USA
> 
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 19:23, "B. D. Colen" <bd at bdcolenphoto.com> wrote:
> 
>> Nope. And I believe the fault lies not with Fuji, but rather with Adobe. 
>> As a couple of posters on this site point out, the in camera conversion 
>> engine turns out terrific, high detail, jpgs - so it can be done.
>> Typed with big fingers on tiny keys
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>
>> Sender: lug-bounces+bd=bdcolenphoto.com at leica-users.org
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:49:57 
>> To: Leica Users Group<lug at leica-users.org>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1
>> 
>> This sort of thing?
>> 
>> http://chromasoft.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05/lightroom-41-and-fuji-x-pro1-oh-dear.html
>> 
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> IF they are true RAW files, then the camera isn't doing anything to them 
>> - they are simply the data captured by the sensor - no sharpening, no in 
>> camera "correction." When they are converted to DNG, they are being 
>> converted to a theoretically lossless compressed format, but, again, are 
>> unaltered. Then the fun begins. Apparently the Adobe conversion is doing 
>> something wrong, because the files end up with a weird pattern - a sort 
>> of checkerboard pattern, with little crosses in the checkerboard squares, 
>> and dots, that I can see very faintly at 66 percent, and painfully 
>> clearly at 100 percent.
>> Typed with big fingers on tiny keys
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Taylor <r.s.taylor at comcast.net>
>> Sender: lug-bounces+bd=bdcolenphoto.com at leica-users.org
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:24:29
>> To: Leica Users Group<lug at leica-users.org>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>


Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
In reply to: Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
Message from ekowaleski at twmi.rr.com (Edward Kowaleski) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
Message from ekowaleski at twmi.rr.com (Edward Kowaleski) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)