Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Official is better than rumor! Thanks! Jeffery Sent from my iPad Jeffery L. Smith New Orleans, Louisiana USA On Jun 26, 2012, at 20:26, Will von Dauster <vondauster at earthlink.net> wrote: > According to the officially released Fuji lens roadmap, a 35mm EQ (23mm) > f1.4 will be released next year. I'm already on the list... > > Will von Dauster > > On Jun 26, 2012, at 6:30 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> For someone who can love a rangefinder with a just a 50 mm lens, the Fuji >> is way more viable for me than my M8. In just about every way. I hope the >> rumors of a fast 35 mm equivalent lens pans out. >> >> Jeffery >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> Jeffery L. Smith >> New Orleans, Louisiana >> USA >> >> On Jun 26, 2012, at 19:23, "B. D. Colen" <bd at bdcolenphoto.com> wrote: >> >>> Nope. And I believe the fault lies not with Fuji, but rather with Adobe. >>> As a couple of posters on this site point out, the in camera conversion >>> engine turns out terrific, high detail, jpgs - so it can be done. >>> Typed with big fingers on tiny keys >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> >>> Sender: lug-bounces+bd=bdcolenphoto.com at leica-users.org >>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:49:57 >>> To: Leica Users Group<lug at leica-users.org> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1 >>> >>> This sort of thing? >>> >>> http://chromasoft.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05/lightroom-41-and-fuji-x-pro1-oh-dear.html >>> >>> john >>> ________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> IF they are true RAW files, then the camera isn't doing anything to them >>> - they are simply the data captured by the sensor - no sharpening, no in >>> camera "correction." When they are converted to DNG, they are being >>> converted to a theoretically lossless compressed format, but, again, are >>> unaltered. Then the fun begins. Apparently the Adobe conversion is doing >>> something wrong, because the files end up with a weird pattern - a sort >>> of checkerboard pattern, with little crosses in the checkerboard >>> squares, and dots, that I can see very faintly at 66 percent, and >>> painfully clearly at 100 percent. >>> Typed with big fingers on tiny keys >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Richard Taylor <r.s.taylor at comcast.net> >>> Sender: lug-bounces+bd=bdcolenphoto.com at leica-users.org >>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:24:29 >>> To: Leica Users Group<lug at leica-users.org> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information