Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there - Mark
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 00:34:18 -0400

It was not one of those lenses which were tricky on an M9 you had to send it
in or something.
I was just reading Erwin was saying the problems with the 90 Apo asph on the
M9 or a myth. Not his words. By far.
As that's a main lens for me that bit of info gets my interest.



On 5/19/13 6:32 PM, "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> wrote:

> Has to be.  No reason it would not be.
> 
> Tina
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Its not clear to me if I do land a new M240 if the f1 is doable on it or
>> not. I'm thinking it would be.
>> 
>> 




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there - Mark)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Mark's 5.6 and be there - Mark)