Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The Fuji M-Adapter
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 22:18:54 -0700
References: <519C0A9F.6090906@jayburleson.com> <CAAsXt4NcfW=+pM4zEpNFSxXatM6UWE8JeTc3PYrRERFD661aSQ@mail.gmail.com> <A9429626-899D-45AE-B4E5-9F3E0DBB2990@mac.com>
 
Thank you very much George. 

Sent from my iPad

On May 24, 2013, at 9:19 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:

> Depth of field of a given lens does not change due to format.
> Though your working distance may change;
> And that distance will effect DOF at a given aperture.
> 
> a note off the iPad, George
> 
> On May 21, 2013, at 9:40 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> One thing I am unsure of, and perhaps others know the answer to, is if at
>> f1,4 there is greater depth of field on the Fuji's cropped sensor vs the 
>> M9
>> full sensor.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] The Fuji M-Adapter)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] The Fuji M-Adapter)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] The Fuji M-Adapter)