Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 21:26:41 -0700
References: <CAAsXt4NC4i7yKoWwQ9HqsAyYG8B6uPNqWu001f=Bwj6AXcUKZQ@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C558A75D@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

I think you hit on it John. When trying focus peeking I had the lenses wide 
open (f/1 & f/2). Probably not enough contrast to work vs stopping down.
Bob

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 1, 2013, at 7:15 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> Just been playing with focus confirmation, 35mm Summilux asph at 70cm, you 
> can see the red lines for focus move as you change aperture and the LV 
> stays about the same brightness throughout.
> 
> john
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> I would not disagree with those findings, I ordered mine when there was a
>> lot of worry about what the images would look like. I decided that I did 
>> not
>> like using DSLRs these days and it would cost a lot of money to try and 
>> find
>> lenses that are worthy of the D800E, amusingly on getdpi there are people
>> using Leica 19mm v2, 28mm and 50mm Summicron lenses over anything else
>> ;-) So I sold my D800E with <200 shots for what I paid for it and knew I 
>> could
>> use the M for the same things (macro, longer lenses) that I didn't use the
>> D800E for if I preferred the M9.
>> 
>> I have found the M images comparable to M9 as taken but with far more
>> malleability. I have found the focus aid OK to use with static objects on 
>> the
>> rear screen (no EVF yet) with both M and R lenses, but it is unlikely to 
>> be as
>> good as an R body for the latter. If buying a first camera I would go for 
>> the M,
>> probably will pick it up in preference to the M9, but unless it does 
>> something
>> the M9 doesn't (LV, higher dynamic range, more lens choice, more
>> responsive etc there is not a huge reason to upgrade IMO. My batteries are
>> only on their second charge but their life has not wowed me with minimal 
>> LV.
>> I have seen people complain of the EV settings, however I always use 
>> manual
>> exposure so cannot help.
>> 
>> There is a button on the front face (just under the top cover) that 
>> brings in
>> magnified LV if wanted. I have had the focus peaking work on many subjects
>> (inc yesterday's flower) but cannot yet say how an EVF works on it.....
>> 
>> john
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> 
>>> On Friday I went to Samy's in Los Angeles where they had just received
>>> their demo M. I was able to play with it for about 1-1/2 hours using
>>> my lenses and SD card, but just inside the store in the Leica section. 
>>> What I
>> noted was:
>>> 
>>> Good:
>>> 1.   The smoothness of the shutter is wonderful. No "kick" back on my
>>> finger, like in the M8 and to a lesser degree the M9. Buttery, quiet
>>> and no noticeable lag. EXTREMELY impressed!
>>> 2.   The averaging (matrix) metering mode works very well. I had it on 
>>> the
>>> classic mode for some shots and the highlights were blown because
>>> there was a lot of black wall which metered gray. On the new
>>> "Advanced" mode it figured this out and I got a decent histogram.
>>> 3.   The rangefinder is crisp and accurate. Lines were white for mine and
>>> easy to see/use.
>>> 4.   The files are bigger (duh)
>>> 5.   The shutter response time, when not using live view/focus peaking,
>>> seemed faster than the M9. It was certainly noticeably quieter.
>>> 6.   With live view, when you turn the lens to focus, the live view goes 
>>> to
>>> the same magnification level (0, 5X or 10X) that you last used.
>>> 7.   Live view, through the EVF, does show depth of field.
>>> 8.   Nice LCD screen on the back, though I would not use it except to see
>>> the histogram...
>>> 9.   The camera feels very nice in your hands. Definitely a Leica M. The
>>> thumb ridge is great.
>>> 10.  Base plate is much sturdier; not tinny as on the M9.
>>> 
>>> Not so good:
>>> 1.   Focus peaking did not work for me on eyes. For portraits of non 
>>> moving
>>> folks, you can use live view to see your focus on the eyes,
>>> etc.(especially magnified 5 or 10X) and also see your DOF, but no
>>> focus peeking indicators showed where the focus was.
>>> 2.   Live view does not magnify after turning the lens until after a very
>>> noticeable pause; my guess is about 1 second. A real delay...
>>> 3.   There is a noticeable shutter release lag when using live view. VERY
>>> noticeable. From what I've read, the shutter is open for live view and
>>> must close and then fire. In rangefinder mode, as noted above, there
>>> is absolutely no lag.
>>> 4.   ISO above 1600 (even 1/2 stop more at 2000) is not useful. Just a
>>> really big difference between 1600 and 2000 to the dark areas showing
>>> large blotches.
>>> 5.   I had trouble finding how to set EV (I usually shoot at -1/3 just to
>>> ensure I don't blow highlights). Probably my lack of knowledge of the
>>> menu system (which has changed), so most likely not the camera's fault...
>>> 
>>> Conclusion: This camera is every bit an M with minor improvements FOR
>>> ME over the M9, the biggest of which is the sensor size. Live view
>>> seems to be made for movie making (which I did not test and would not
>>> use) or landscapes. Not for street/family shooting. The shutter is
>>> sweet. The ISO performance minimally improved. Though I was excited
>>> about the camera, especially using Live View with focus peeking to
>>> shoot my family and street work, it basically is not usable, IMO, for
>>> that. The larger sensor does nothing for me as this is not my
>>> landscape camera. Most likely when my number comes up on various
>> dealers' lists to buy the M, I won't.
>>> 
>>> Of course I have specific uses for my Ms. For my needs, the
>>> improvements I saw did not warrant the cost of a replacement for my M9.
>>> 
>>> Then I tested a Monochrom... I'm trying not to think about what I
>>> experienced to save my marriage...
>>> 
>>> Just thought I'd pass this along. Happy to answer any questions.
>>> Bob
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Bob Adler
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica M (Type 240) Experience)