Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Its also that he was dying to never have to print that damn neg again. By the way the Number 4 through 5 papers and papers with filters in the late 80's certainly packed enough contrast to print a neg which was only a thin stain on the emulsion. It was hard to find a neg so thing you could not make a pretty nice print from it. But he wouldn't have known that. The one time I chromium intensived a neg I got severe reticulation. And was the only time I ever got reticulation. I don't know how many years off my life using chromium intensifier once took off. But it was a few. On 6/4/13 8:25 PM, "Ken Carney" <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote: > I'll bet the pucker factor was high when AA dipped the bottom part of the > Moonrise neg into chromium intensifier to bring out the crosses. I've seen > numerous versions of Moonrise, including the one with two moons, courtesy > of > his assistants. > > Ken > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Robert G > Adler > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 7:05 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji XE-1 > > It's like keeping your Costco prints and throwing out your negatives! > Every time you save a jpg you lose information. Also software improves but > without your raw file you cant take advantage of that improvement. > Ansel worked on prints from the Moon Over Hernandez negative for decades. > No > two prints are exactly alike. He couldn't do that saving jpgs only. > Cards/memory is cheap. You can save both simultaneously with just some loss > on write time. Why not save the raw too since there is a lot you stand to > loose? > Bob > > Bob Adler > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:13 PM, mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com> wrote: > >> the jpgs from fuji are so good, i don't know why i should shoot raw, >> so far both phase one and lr are compared against the in camera jpgs >> by most reviewers and jpgs stand out >> >> ------------------------------------- >> regards, mehrdad >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Except he doesn't shoot raw! >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Nice review: >>> http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2013 >>> /06/fuji-x-e1-the-keeper.html >>> theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2013/06/fuj >>> i-x-e1-the-keeper-part-ii.html >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Jayanand >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/