Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:51:01 -0500
References: <CAE3QcF6ko0zYwgG6+kruGFhm+6j6dTZaMYLFtF+C=vT_b6Asxw@mail.gmail.com> <CDEFDA9B.C24B%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CAE3QcF5=u+jMRHjVmcSa84skqMWvWaTi03XnhAqX7Cb8asOqDw@mail.gmail.com> <ED012A5A-FFF9-4AA9-9AAC-9C23290AB4BC@btinternet.com>
The higher the technology, the more catastrophic the failure. Can't one
think of a Fuji as a backup rather than a change to another system? Like a
S&W airweight in an ankle holster? Why not get a Fuji X100s (no
interchangeable lenses) as a backup? Since it has a fixed lens, nobody can
complain that you've abandoned Leica for another brand.
Jeffery
In reply to:
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHH!!!)