Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Since Jayanand got auto-biographical, I thought I'd do the same. I started developing film and making contact prints at high-school age if not before. I think my first exposure to Kodachrome was around 1948 when my wife, a friend, and I made a trip from Chicago to a series of national parks. The friend had a borrowed Leica (F, I think) and 50, 90, and 135 mm lenses. I was hooked. He and I alternated possession of the slides every six months, and projecting those incredible slides repeatedly brought back vivid memories of the trip. Eventually, I bought an Omega enlarger and started getting serious about B&W. Never was particularly pleased with any of my prints, and the majority of my shots were still Kodachrome. Around 1971, temporary unemployment which in a recession promised to possibly last a year, caused me to accept a job, relocation expenses provided, with ICL in England. To my annoyance, I found that Kodak UK was on strike, that a million rolls of Kodachrome was in their premises waiting to be processed, and that the nearest place to get the stuff processed was in France. I decided then and there that this was a good opportunity to try to develop some skill at B&W. I had not brought my enlarger to England, so I joined a camera club in order to use their darkroom. It turned out that the hours of availability did not suit me and I bought an inexpensive Opemus enlarger. But I stayed with the club, which had monthly competitions, sometimes prints, sometimes slides. In time, I even wound up with prints that I was proud of. An interesting aside comment is that they expected 16 x 20 prints but I managed to get by with 11 x 14. 8 x 10 would have been totally unacceptable except for one time when the had a competition expressly for "small" prints. What amused me was that in this country, where people had little money, big prints were expected; when I got back this relatively richer country, I saw competitions just full of 8 x 10 prints an smaller. One day, I decided it would be neat to prints some of my slides, so I bought a color head for my Omega. I first tried the Ilford process because it was reputed to be the most archival. I ultimately came to grief with it when I tried to print a picture of my Abyssinian cat, a mountain lion colored critter. He'd come out greenish or reddish; no way could I get his true color. I switched to a Kodak reversal paper and got a perfect print on the first try. In time, I realized that if prints were my objective, color negs were obviously the way to go, and I switched my operation to developing color negs and printing them. For color balance, I just used very crude tools: the Kodak viewing filters, and usually got a good print on at worst my second try. Very rarely did it take three tries. Alas, a few years after acquiring my pride and joy, an M6 TTL which I've got to get around to selling one of these days, I just burned out on darkroom work, and several rolls of film are still sitting around unprocessed. I might in time have gone back to the darkroom, but my wife decided that we needed a second bathroom, and there went the darkroom. I gave away the equipment. Having spent too many hours of my life in front of a computer, both professionally and for entertainment, I was very reluctant to get into digital photography. Ultimately, I decided I had to find out if I could live with it, so I bought a cheap Nikon point-and-shoot and Lightroom 2 and played around for a while. Having decided that I could live with it, I then thought about a camera with a full-frame sensor. I was pondering Nikon or Canon but kept wistfully remembering how much I enjoyed using the M6 and finally decided that at my age you can't take it with you and sprung for an M9 which I just love. I use the two lenses, 35 an 90 chrons that I bought when I got the second-hand M6. They both were made in Canada, some time in the '70s. The 35 came from a dealer, the 90 was bought from Henning Wolfe. Herbert Kanner kanner at acm.org 650-326-8204 Question authority and the authorities will question you. On Jul 6, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com> wrote: > With Dr. Ted's famous quote used to sum it all up... > http://www.the.me/b-d-colen-on-the-distraction-of-color-the-subject-is-black-and-white/#ixzz2YKfnZYo6 > -- > Jay, > > Jay Burleson Gallery <http://jayburleson.com/leica/gallery/index.php/> > "A photographer is simply someone who is > looking for something that can't be found. > The photograph is the record of that attempt." > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information