Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DMR+Leica R versus Canon+R Adapter
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 15:11:52 -0500
References: <mailman.1216.1373253253.1363.lug@leica-users.org> <9D1730D7-CED1-4672-B73B-A165C06D4FED@yahoo.com.sg> <92B9F261-03AB-4521-AC7A-A076BE016631@mac.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C574CBF2@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

On Jul 8, 2013, at 2:50 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> And on first look, will revisit when Leica adaptor is finally released, 
> focussing imprecision at mid distances with longer lenses...
> 
> The auto diaphragm does not matter with the EVF, I have done test shots 
> where I could 'see' and focus with the EVF but not a chance by r/f. 
> However the latter two are quite major for some work, does not always 
> preclude handheld but is not a 2fps solution!

I'm seriously interested in your real world experience in these regards.

At what point does the "stopping down" become a focusing issue John;
if at all?

Are you saying that focusing with the EVF at f:8, 11 and 16 is doable and 
accurate?

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] DMR+Leica R versus Canon+R Adapter)
In reply to: Message from davidhhching at yahoo.com.sg (David Ching) ([Leica] DMR+Leica R versus Canon+R Adapter)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] DMR+Leica R versus Canon+R Adapter)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] DMR+Leica R versus Canon+R Adapter)