Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The reason why I've held on to my Leica glass is exactly this. That it should not be too far down the line when a simple not too pricey pancake mirrorless viable solution will come along and I'll be using them again. This is just the first. The next ill be its competition and we'll really be cooking with pressurized steam. Bit of Leica M use is undercut it will be done by its competition it wont be done by Leica itself. ...Or The Leica X Vario would have been full frame. And less M 240's would be on order. On 10/15/13 3:34 PM, "Doug Herr" <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote: > Frank Filippone wrote: > >> I do not see a downside to this camera... >> >> The issue with the WA lenses, and obtuse light ray angles is still TBD. >> >> Leica should buy the camera, stick on a M mount, do a little bit of FW >> revision for its lenses, and sell it as an entry level M camera. >> >> Maybe Leitax will do it....? >> > > The user can stick an M mount on it (or an R, F, A, LTM, MD, FD...). I'm > interested in the viewfinder, responsiveness and file color quality. I > won't > be an early adopter but I'll be paying very close attention to user > reports. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/