Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/05/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I remember reading recently about a blind test where modern, mass produced violins were at least on par if not better than Stradivarius--the test subjects were professional musicians, not just casual listeners. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On May 17, 2014, at 12:27 AM, Peter Klein wrote: > A number of my friends are symphony musicians. Today, one of them posted > on Facebook that she had found a great online deal on a set of high-end > violin strings, and wondered if they were OK. This led to a discussion of > the fine points of shelf life, variants of the brand, and whether a > platinum-coated E-string is better than a plain tin one. > > And I wished that the "your camera (or lens) doesn't matter" crowd were > listening in. Yes, musicians argue over instruments, strings, reeds and > mouthpieces, just as artists *do* argue over paintbrushes, and > photographers argue about cameras and lenses. Does anyone seriously > believe that a cheap school-orchestra fiddle should sound as good as a > Stradivarius or Guarneri violin? Yes, the best players might be able to > make the bad fiddle sound reasonably good, but no way would it sound as > good as the Strad. > > So why do some of us constantly down people who prefer Lens A over Lens B, > or Camera 1 over Camera 2? The lens "resonates" the light, emphasizing > some aspects while diminishing others, just as the instrument resonates > the sound. The camera's ergonomics and design are optimum for one type of > picture over another. And a camera that you have to fight to get the shot > is just as hampering as the violin with a bad "wolf" tone in an exposed > passage. > > Yes, of course musicians can get cultlike about this brand over that, just > as photographers do about cameras and lenses. Yes, a good photographer my > be able to take a decent picture with any camera or lens, just as the > musician may be able to turn in a decent performance with any instrument. > But if my friend is going to play a big solo, she wants the best violin > and strings she can afford. If you handed her a cheap school fiddle and > told her that "instruments don't matter, it's the musician that makes the > music," she would probably think you were an ignoramus (to be charitable). > And she'd be right. > > The hard truth is: Tools do matter. Maybe not so much with Web-sized > JPGs, and maybe not to rank beginners. But once you're doing things "for > real," they do matter. A lot. > > --Peter > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >