Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]#1 is taken with no filter in diffuse daylight; #2 was taken with an orange filter in mixed light, and #3 was no filter and some kind of horrendous sodium-vapor light that created tons of noise at ISO 4000 (and of the three, is the one that required some post?). Cheers, Dante > On Jul 12, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote: > > All,with different personalities. I'm most taken with the presence and > clarity of 1, and like the photojournalism feel of 3. > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Jul 12, 2015, at 10:26 PM, Dante Stella <dstella1 at ameritech.net> >> wrote: >> >> So I have been out of town with the M typ 246 (the new Monochrome), >> seeing just how bad light can be with the ZM lenses. I also pressed my >> kids into service for same exercise - and one of them in turn enlisted a >> couple of Miss Teen New Jerseys (?princesses!?). >> >> http://www.dantestella.com/past/past133.html >> >> http://www.dantestella.com/past/past134.html >> >> http://www.dantestella.com/past/past135.html >> >> Let me know what you think. The Zeiss wides are actually pretty >> spectacular in less abusive lighting conditions. >> >> Dante >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information