Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1995/12/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Humm.... Unless it has been modified, it should have lines for the 90 and 135. The M2 had the 35 and 90 lines. That aside, either the M2 or M3 is a fine camera. In fact my M6 is the backup for my M2 most of the time. Any M lens can be used on either body, but you'll need an auxillary finder for those which don't have built in lines. As far as cost goes; in the condition you describe, about $1000-$1500 US, depending on what variation of the body you are condsidering. Remember that the M3 was in production for a LONG time. There are many variations to consider. kw >I'm concidering an M3 as a back up body for my M6. >I would welcome comments on the M3, especially the price of one in good >condition (i.e. no scratches, dents, generally in good shape) > >Oh yes .... It has frames for the 35 & 90 .... can you also fit a 21mm ---- Ken Wilcox preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu> Davison Middle School <kwilcox@genesee.freenet.org> 600 Dayton, Davison, MI 48423 <kwilcox@artoo.gisd.k12.mi.us>