Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/02/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Fat Tele-Elmarit (fwd)
From: Gary J Toop <gtoop@uoguelph.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 10:55:04 -0500 (EST)


	Funny, I was just wondering the same thing!  I would also be 
curious to know how the two Tele-Elmarits compare to older versions of 
the 90/2.8 Elmarit.

Gary Toop
gtoop@uoguelph.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 22:18:56 -0700
From: C.M. Fortunko <fortunko@boulder.nist.gov>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Fat Tele-Elmarit

Does anyone know how the first version of the 90mm/2.8 Tele-Elmarit compares
optically with the second version. 

The two versions are quite different in design. The second version is
simplier and lighter. Is it also better optically?


Pax et Lux,

Chris Fortunko, home phone (303)-494-7246, home e-mail FortunkoC@aol.com



Replies: Reply from "joe b." <joe@azurite.demon.co.uk> (Re: Fat Tele-Elmarit (fwd))