Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: Film choice: Durability... -Reply
From: Fred Ward <fward@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 1996 09:03:55 -0500
Organization: Gem Book Publishers
References: <v01520d00ae02f26761f9@[205.235.32.42]>

Claude, 

Digital technology is no where near the point of film quality. There are 
an estimated 360 megabytes of information in a Kodachrome 25 slide. 
Current technology lets you record somewhere between 1 and 12 megs of 
data on a 35mm digital camera. You can see how much you give up.

I suspect there will never be any interest or need for a Leica digital 
camera. The Canon and Nikon versions sell well for catalog work and for 
some photojournalism needs where speed is everything and you can avoid 
processing. This allows pictures from news stories and Olympics to be 
sent within seconds  of taking. 

But putting a digital back onto a Leica would be counterproductive. The 
size advantage of small Leicas would be lost and the superior lens 
advantage would be missed totally when it hit pixels instead of film 
grains. Digital cameras are all SLRs for a reason. No one wants to 
transform a small, light, beautifully-made Leica M into a huge digital 
beast. 

Actually, there are real advantages to making 2 1/4 cameras and 4x5 
cameras digital standards. Quality is much better with that many more 
pixels available.  

Fred Ward

In reply to: Message from zapcomix@silcom.com (ClaudeBatmanghelidj) (Re: Film choice: Durability... -Reply)