Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Leica Lens vs Nikon Lens
From: "Jeff Segawa" <segawa@netone.com>
Date: 24 Nov 96 08:47:26 -0600

>Jeff....what aperture Nikon was that 35-70 zoom?  I sold mine..the 3.5-4.5
>model due to very lacklustre image quality.

Generally, I shoot Leica and Nikon in the f/4-f/8 range. Minox tends to be
used from f/8-f/11 in order not to go beyond the max 1/500th sec shutter
speed. For those who are wondering, the Minox is not used on a tripod, but
I may do so if I can figure out how the heck to fit a camera this small
with a QR plate :-) 

The AF-Nikkor was used with the rigid factory lens shade and Hoya UV(0).
The Summicron has a built-in hood (very handy!) and was used with a Hoya
UV(0) filter, which also doubled as the lens cap (it was clean throughout
the shooting). No filter or hood was used on the Minox, though I do take
care to shield the lens from direct glare using the door of the camera
itself, or my hand. Was not aware that a hood was available for this, the
original Minox 35, and I didn't see any obvious means of attachment.

By the way, the f/3.5-f/4.5, 35-70 Nikon zoom is an entirely different
beast from the f/2.8 AF-Nikkor. I've seen the slower optic sell for under
$100, brand new. It's compact, lightweight and sorta hard to manually
focus, as the focusing action is not especially smooth. The f/2.8 is
somewhere over $600, and it's a heck of a lot bigger and heavier. I've
needed that max speed on a few occasions, and the lens has performed
admirably. Manual focus on this critter is twitch-quick but smooth.


- ---------------------------------------------------
Jeff Segawa (segawa@netone.com)
Boulder, Colorado, USA
Specialist in interesting, quality junk.
Seeking Kiev 60 and Horizont-202 related items.
- ---------------------------------------------------