Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1996/11/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Leica versus Hasselblad(Zeiss) glass
From: "Jeff Segawa" <segawa@netone.com>
Date: 29 Nov 96 13:21:47 -0600

>Leica lenses typically have many more blades in their apertures
>(~10  I think?).  This could have more subtle effects in all out of focus
>areas that could make Leica pictures appear better (the "glow"?).

The current 50 Summicron-M has 7 blades, as do some of the pro Nikon lenses
and all of the ARSAT (Kiev) lenses that I own. Suffice to say that the
Nikon and Leica optics hold a more nearly circular shape at smaller
aptertures better than the inexpensive Ukraininan glass, as they should,
given the vast price difference. If  memory serves, the Rolleiflex and
Rolleicord TLRs have especially circular diaphragm arrangements, but TLRs
and I have never quite come to terms, much as I respect the essential
simplicity of the designs.

For the life of me, I can't figure out what this Leica "glow" is either :-)
- ---------------------------------------------------
Specialist in interesting, quality junk.
Seeking Kiev 60 and Horizont-202 related items.
- ---------------------------------------------------