Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lucien, I do not in any way question your response, I am curious in how you got your hands on a 40 Elmarit to determine your response. In the rarefied number of the 40 MM Elmarit that were made, how did you find one of these lenses to make the measurements ( eyeball or otherwise) to compare the 2 lenses? Thank You Frank Filippone red735i@worldnet.att.net - ---------- > From: Lucien <100774.527@CompuServe.COM> > To: Leica Users <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Subject: Re: APOLOGY : Elmarit 40 mm 2,8 > Date: Tuesday, February 25, 1997 12:26 AM > > Lugs, > > Yesterday, > > I was wrong about the 40 mmm f2,8(elmarit). > The cam of that lense is made like the cam of the 40 mm f2 (summicron). > > It is only the cam of the 40 mm Rokkor who is like the cam of the Leica - -M > lenses (flat) > > Sorry about that. > > Lucien. > > >