Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Leica Wide Angles? / Contax vs Leica
From: ABreull@aol.com
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 02:40:55 -0400 (EDT)

In einer eMail vom 02.08.1997  03:37:54, schreiben Sie:

>> Try to get a used Super Angulon. Although slower, the older f 4.0 or 3.4
>are
>> even better than the 2.8 (sharpness, contrast), and the Super Angulon is
>> better than the Elmarit (sharpness).
>
> The Leicas (M6, M5, CL) only have TTLmetering so the lens designers are
forced to design their lenses around this. This probably accounts why the
21mm lenses went 'backwards' instead of 'forwards' in terms of optical
performance.     
>
>

Nope. Leitz had some money and patent quarrels with Schneider. Schneider
lost, but took the Super Angulon home. That's why the 21's go backwards, and
Leitz needs to offer the Elmarit now.

- - Alf