Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Thanks, Paul, for a good comparison of the construction of the two bodies. >My question: If electronic shutter and other components are cheaper *and* >just as accurate *and* just as reliable *and* just as durable, why doesn't >Leica make the switch? What price should Leitz expect us to pay for >battery-independence? Chuck, I never said that they are as reliable or as durable. I think that this remains to be seen. I do think that you would be able to repair an M6 practically forever. If nothing else, a skilled machinist could make replacement parts. There is already a small industry dedicated to keeping M-series bodies alive, and I have no doubt that this will continue. Many electronic components will finite lives. For instance, LCD panels only last a decade or so, and will be difficult or impossible to replace when the manufacturer stops supporting the product. Think about the displays, motors, circuits, switches, ROMS, etc. Breakdowns on an M6 will be pretty straightforward mechanical problems. If a G camera is acting up, is the problem with one of the switches or sensors, or is it a faulty ROM? Look at electronic cameras from the early 1980s--they are not that old, but many can no longer be repaired. Also, I bought an M6 because I wanted a metal-bodied, manual-focus, manual-exposure, mechanical camera. I didn't WANT an auto, electronic camera. - - Paul