Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/08/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, Erwin Puts wrote: > Hello Gary > > Gary J. Toop wrote: > > It sounds to me as though the Planar-T that you tested was very > > similar in performance to the most recent non-ASPH 35 Summicron.... > Yes you are correct. It would not surprise me that Leica designed the > ASPH to regain the lead that became less since the Planar-T arrived. > That's an interesting possibility. I did wonder why they would try to outdo the non-ASPH 35 Summicron. Perhaps the Planar-T edges past it in some areas of performance. > > On another note, I would be curious to learn how the 90/2.8 > > Sonnar-T and the 90/2.8 Elmarit-M compare, if you have ever or will > > ever make such a comparison. > > If I would add all requests for comparisons it would be very long > indeed. I may also add that the way I do my testing takes much time. The > Leica 35mm comparison took me more than a month and I am still > learning!Erwin Sorry! I should have thought of that. I am sure that I speak for most or all of the others here in saying many thanks for all the testing that you do. I had a look at your "imx" website and found it very interesting. Gary