Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1997/11/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: DOF question (was: Mistake in ...)
From: "Craig W. Shier" <shier@mnsinc.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 22:45:13 -0500

Also as I recall, DOF varies with subject distance.  At close distances the
DOF is more 50/50 in front/behind.

shier@mnsinc.com
- -----Original Message-----
From: Art Searle <w2nra@3villagecsd.k12.ny.us>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Monday, November 24, 1997 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: DOF question (was: Mistake in ...)


>Alf wrote:
>>Is there a changement in the general consens meanwhile?
>>I learnt (long long years ago), that the DOF-limits are about 1/3 before
>>the subject and 2/3 behind. So, I can't explain your -3.2 and +3.3 cm at
>>f 1.4 from the 1.4/75 mm Summilux.
>
>That would be true for an aperture of approximately f/28.  As you open up
>from there the ratio is closer.  At f16 it is 2/5th before, 3/5th behind
the
>subject.  At f/8 it is 9/20th before, 11/20th behind.  As you stop down the
>ratio shifts the other way.  At f/64 it is 3/20th before, 17/20th behind.
>Without getting too technical this calculation is a function of the
>_circle_of _confusion_times_lens_aperture_times_focused_distance_ in the
>divisor of the two equations for depth of field.  In the equation for
d.o.f.
>in front of the subject, it is added to the divisor.  In the equation for
>d.o.f. behind, it is substracted.  The formula is simpler than I make it
>sound.  It's easy to make a Lotus spread sheet to calculate this for you.
>
>Art
>
>
>