Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/01/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] 21m comparison (long)
From: TTAbrahams <TTAbrahams@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:02:40 EST
 
Erwin, great test of the 21's.I agree with it. the 21/4 is not a great
performer and the 21 Asph has surprised me with its quality. It is better than
the 21/3,4, and that is a statement that I never thought I would express. I
still keep my 21/3,4 around, it is smaller and more compact and the prints
have a certain look to them, but for critical work the 21/2,8 Asph is the way
to go. Maybe we have an other benchmark Leica lens on our hands here. 
 Tom A