Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for your advice. I've never played with a HM, only the regular M6 and it works fine for me and my "four eyese." Regards, d. - -----Original Message----- From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Monday, April 13, 1998 2:39 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Newbie to be -- My experiences with G2 / M options? >If you wear glasses and like 35mm lenses, forget totally about an M6HM. You >cannot see the entire 35mm frame in the HM without glasses. The same is >true with a regular M6 and the 28mm lens. > >The M6 meter is a semi spot meter, and with it, you will be able to meter >on particular parts of the subject with high accuracy. You can't do that >easily with an M4 meter. > >Jim > >At 12:38 AM 4/13/98 -0400, you wrote: >>Thanks Bill. Being both a beancounter and a IT geek, I do wear glasses. As >>35mm lenses are my fave, are you suggesting that I go with a regular M6? >>What are the problems? In addition, the HM doesn't have the 28mm >>framelines, correct? What happens if you want to use a 28mm lens? >> >>What about a M4 with add-on meter and the Sumilux Asp 35mm/1.4? >> >>Daniel Ho/Toronto