Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7
From: Mark Kronquist <mak@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 11:00:38 +0000

R6 WAS the model before the R6.2 only significant difference is 1/2000th
speed. Used R6 run about $1000
- ----------
> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> 
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us, leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 
> Subject: Re: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7 
> Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 10:34:29 -0700 
> 
>When you say R6, do you mean R6.2?
>
>
>At 05:13 PM 5/14/98 +0000, Mark Kronquist wrote:
>>You lose depending on batteries you gain freedo, creativity and the
essence
>>of life itself...if you don't use 1/2000 very often save a bundle ( be
>>thrifty like me) and buy a used R6)   Mark
>>----------
>>> From: Five Senses Productions <fls@5senses.com> 
>>> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 
>>> Subject: [Leica] R4 v. R6.2 v. R7
>>> Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 12:36:57 -0700 
>>> 
>>>I now have an R4 and am considering replacing it with an R6.2 or R7.
>>>I only use my R camera with lenses longer than 100mm, namely
>>>the 100 APO and the 180/2.8.  The only other lenses I would ever get
>>>for the R would be the 280 or the 400, and possibly maybe the 19.
>>>
>>>Which R body would be the best for my needs?  I like the 6.2 myself
>>>because it is mechanical, but what do I lose with it?
>>>
>>>
>>>Francesco Sanfilippo,
>>>Five Senses Productions
>>>webmaster@5senses.com
>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.5senses.com/
>>>
>> 
>
>
>Francesco Sanfilippo,
>Five Senses Productions
>webmaster@5senses.com
>
>
>http://www.5senses.com/
>