Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] cron vs lux
From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb@ans.com.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 12:45:24 +0000

Summicron1@aol.com wrote:
> I am firmly convinced that the improvements
> that people see in the 1.4 aspherical lenses are at least partially, and
> perhaps, totally, in their minds. You say F-2 is "average" speed, but it is
> actually quite fast. With modern films you really do not need anything faster
> to still get very good results except in the most demanding sports situations.

Is it only me who wants to shoot Kodachrome 25?

> For an extra $1,500 or so (you WERE going to buy a used summicron, were you
> not? Of course you were.) you get a lens that, maybe, performs a teeny bit
> better, and has one stop more speed. Big whoop.

It's funny how perspectives differ. I personally attach
considerable value to an extra stop of speed. Even if I load a
film of appropriate speed the sun seems to have this funny habit
of going down at the most inconvenient time leaving me wishing
for a couple of stops more speed. Heck, I'm still waiting for a
bright enough day where I can use K25 with my f2.8 lens. What
with cloud cover f2.8 wears very thin very fast.
 
> so, you want to take pictures or do you want to spend money and impress your
> friends?
>
> charlie trentelman
> Ogden, Utah

- -- 
Chris Bitmead
http://www.ans.com.au/~chrisb
mailto:chrisb@ans.com.au