Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re[2]: Re(2): [Leica] Untitled Magazine ?7
From: Alistair_Stewart_at_DF5007@ccmailgw.mcgawpark.baxter.com
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 15:20:23 -0500

- --IMA.Boundary.389098509
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part

     Mary,
     
     As I recall, Issue 1 opened up with the M6 framelines as the first 
     image...
     
     
     Alistair


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re(2): [Leica] Untitled Magazine ?7
Author:  Mary & Stan Kephart <kephartol@att.net> at Internet
Date:    9/15/98 2:23 PM


     
Hi Francisco,
     
I am an amateur too, and proud of it.  The word, as you probably know, is 
derived from the Latin verb amare, "to love."  So the word means that 
amateurs do what they do because they love it, and does not necessarily 
connote that they do not know what they are doing.
     
I liked the untitledmagazine 7.  Without reading the bios of the 
photographers, it hit home to me that the photographers are young and 
idealisic.  I particularly liked the shot of the boy looking through the 
eye of the large sculpture.  The other shots showed some interesting 
camera angles, which I thoroughly enjoyed.  To keep on topic--one wonders 
how these folks would do if they had a Leica in their hands!
     
Mary K
     
     
     
>I don't agree with BD on his critics to this site. 
>
>I think that this one of the best sites I've visited recently. Beautifully 
>done, sober, easy to use and with a great bunch of pics.
>
>I don't think that the pictures are meaningless. Try to browse the past 
>issues of the magazine and you'll found really good pictures (eg issue 
>#2). Maybe not every single one are technically perfect (bu whats's that, 
>anyway), but good because the photographer has been able to reflect on an 
>image what he was seeing.
>
>But I'm only an amateur.
>Francisco
- --IMA.Boundary.389098509
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822 message headers"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="RFC822 message headers"

Received: from ns1.baxter.com (159.198.180.56) by ccmailgw.mcgawpark.baxter.com
with SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 005B5463; Tue, 15 Sep 98 13:49:02
- -0500
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1])
	by ns1.baxter.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA26870
	for <stewara@baxter.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 13:49:53 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from  by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV)
          id AA17873 Tue, 15 Sep 98 11:21:02 -0700
Received: from mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV)
          id AA17867 Tue, 15 Sep 98 11:20:58 -0700
Received: from [12.68.57.195] by mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.03 118 118 102) with SMTP
          id <19980915182041.LFME18454@[12.68.57.195]>;
          Tue, 15 Sep 1998 18:20:41 +0000
Subject: Re: Re(2): [Leica] Untitled Magazine ?7
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 98 14:23:38 -0500
X-Sender: KEPHARTOL@postoffice.worldnet.att.net
X-Mailer: Claris Emailer 1.1
From: Mary & Stan Kephart <kephartol@att.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>, <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <19980915182041.LFME18454@[12.68.57.195]>
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us

- --IMA.Boundary.389098509--