Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 05:24 PM 10/31/98 -0800, you wrote: >I picked up the Canon 70-200 2.8L from Camera World of Oregon around 5 >months ago for $1250. The Leica 80-200 Vario Elmar purchased locally from Thanks for the tip. :-) >see any performance difference. Even as die-hard Leica fans, we must admit >that the Canon 70-200L is a fine lens. The 80-200 Vario Elmar is also quite >good and, while more compact, isn't that much lighter, and only has a max >aperture of f4. It's a very fine lens. Very Canon. Really sharp, consistent color with the rest of the L series lenses anyway. But it lacks something the Leica 70-180 has. :-) - -- Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch Atheism is a non-prophet organization.