Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] B&W Film
From: "Bryan Willman" <bryanwi@seanet.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 11:46:53 -0800

I have never tried to push TMY.  TMZ pushes well,
works well "unpushed" at 800 or 1600, depending
on how you develop it.

bmw

- -----Original Message-----
From: phong (Doan huu Phong) <phong@doan-ltd.com>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] B&W Film


>To follow up on Bill Ferris' question and Bryan William's answer,
>how do TMZ at 800 and TMY (TMAX 400) also rated at 800
>compare ?   I'd like to use TMY (cheaper, and less sensitive to
>light leaks, and  X-ray problems); unfortunately I have little
>experience and would like to rely on the knowledge of the LUG.
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bryan Willman <bryanwi@seanet.com>
>
>>TMZ - Tmax p3200.  Rate at 800 to be conservative,
>>as fast as 25000 with a hard push.  If you are having
>>the film developed commercially, rate at 800 or 1600.
>>
>>bmw
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ferris Global Asset Management <ferrisgam@worldnet.att.net>
>>
>>>I know this has been amswered before, but I just wasn't paying attention
>>>(sorry).  I am spending a few days in Chicago starting tomorrow and want
>to
>>>use b&w.  What would be recommended for night shooting with 35 and 75 M
>>>summilux?  Thanks
>>>
>>>Bill Ferris
>
>
>