Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] I for one am glad Kodachrome is dead or dying.[!]
From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk@lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 11:43:47 -0800

Eric,

I do understand what you mean about how the processing works and how K-14
vs. E-6 functions.  Frankly, I don't care how a process works, all I care
about is the final result.  For me, Ektachrome E100S is a perfect film.
Let's just say I do not agree with 100% of what you say.  After all, there
are many films on the market to suit a wide range of styles.

Peter K


- -----Original Message-----
From: Eric Welch [mailto:ewelch@ponyexpress.net]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 10:46 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] I for one am glad Kodachrome is dead or dying.[!]


At 08:34 AM 12/14/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Baloney!  Use the new E-6 films and you'll understand why kodak went with
>E-6 vs. K-14.  
>(Physics aside!)

Note: 

I am a professional. I use E6 films. I know what's going on. You obviously
don't understand what I'm saying.
- -- 

Eric Welch
St. Joseph, MO
http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch

"Call me a bigot but I think all racists are inferior."