Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A Leica Question
From: "Richard Clompus" <rclompus@voicenet.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 17:42:00 -0500

Dear Fellow LUGnuts,

Has anyone used the Leica telescope adapter that changes your R telephoto
lenses into small telescopes?  It would be a nice tool to take while
traveling.

I got one of my "dream" lenses today.  A new Leica 19/2.8 R lens in a sealed
box.  My widest Leica lens yet.  It feels better on an R8 than an R 6.2
body.  Somehow after using an R8 for 6 months, the R6.2 seems too small for
my small hands.  Fairly amazing balance with this lens on an R8.  Only my
wrists get tired after a while.

The only problem is that the metal focusing barrel of the lens is scratched.
Looks like someone took a file to it.  Very unusual.  I guess if there's a
lens in a batch with some defect, I'll probably get it.  I've had pretty
good luck up until now.  I took some test shots today with an R8 and Metz
40MZ-3.  Bounce flash with secondary fill seemed to work fine.  E6 film to
be developed tomorrow.  I'll let you know how it turned out.    I can hear
Ted saying that it's the optics that count.  I agree but it would be nice if
the cosmetics of the lens were also first class.  (I have a lot of respect
for Ted.  He does what I wish I could do - be a photographer and earn a
living at the same time.)  Being an eye doctor isn't all bad.  At least I
get to work with lenses every day.

My dealer has ordered me a replacement lens.  I guess maybe I'm expecting
too much for a lens that costs only $3000.  I know it's the optics that
count - and that's why I bought it to use instead of my Canon breech mount
FD20/2.8 lens.  It would just be nice to receive one that was not banged up.

Happy shooting,

Richard
Richard Clompus, OD
West Chester, PA