Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Can someone explain why?
From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@euronet.be>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:06:17 +0100

Well, I guess this what differentiates Leica from "gadgets". In all fairness, the
Ricoh SLR referred to is a cheap one. But as far as I know, there are also much
more expensive Japanese cameras which are not repairable after 10 years. I would
find it utterly unacceptable.

The Leica is for me a mental antidote from our consumerist throw-away culture
(aside from being a wonderful picture-taking tool).

Nathan

Dennis Painter wrote:

> 10 years is pretty good for a 'gadget'  but electronics designed and
> manufactured to the highest standards should last at least 20 years IMO,
> and longer should be typical.
>
> Dennis



- --
Nathan Wajsman
Overijse, Belgium

Photography page:  http://members.tripod.com/~belgiangator/index.html
Motorcycle page:  http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/downs/1704/index.html