Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 26 Mar 99, at 15:06, Bruce Feldman wrote: > Again, style was not the issue. Please try to undertand the thread before > you respond. Of course the G2 better fits the styles of some, I would > assume. For instance, Dan Khong has already told us that his eyes are > going bad. The G2 would be perfect for such a photographer. > > It is just not faster than the M in the hands of an experienced user in > situations where speed is an issue. In addition, by all accounts, the G2 > was *intended* to compete with the M. I'm delighted that some find that > it can fill another niche. But comparing the two is perfectly logical. > By your criteria, no camera could be compared with another. > > Bruce Feldman > Warsaw My apologies Bruce, I don't profess to be a master of debate nor an english scholar, just a photographer who owns and uses an M(4) and G2 system and finds them to be complementary and has few overbearing complaints with either including speed of operation. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 Fax +61-2-9554-9259 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours audiob@ozemail.com.au