Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: For Sale Postings
From: "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:39:46 -0800

Mark,

A tip of my hat . . .

Let's get on to other topics

Bryan
- -----Original Message-----
From: Mark Rabiner <mrabiner@concentric.net>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: For Sale Postings


>Bryan Caldwell wrote:
>>
>> The only thing to clearly emerge from the recent discussion regarding
Friday
>> "for sale" postings is that there is no consensus. There is, however, a
>> policy imposed by the operator of the list - sent, I presume, to everyone
>> when they join. It reads:
>>
>> "It is acceptable for individuals occasionally to post advertisements to
>> sell
>> cameras, and very much acceptable for individuals to post requests to buy
>> cameras. Any user who is obviously conducting a business in the sale of
>> cameras will be removed from the list."
>>
>> (Note that the latter part is largely ignored)
>>
>snip
>Thanks Bryan:
>It is great to finally see the rule or lack of one after all this time
>and discussion in waves. This and your following logic which I have
>sniped here has compleatly won me over.
>I'm not looking forward to seeing more posts of for sale stuff over the
>week but if there is no rule against it and that is the trend then no
>big woof.
>I will miss the academic purity and austerity of our intellectual debate.
>
>Speaking of high ideas and cold hard cash:
>
>Instead of stars: *****
>I think they should review Movies by how much it would be worth to pay
>or be payed to see it.
>Mark :-) Rabiner