Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: MLU
From: "Harold Gess" <gess@icon.co.za>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 21:15:42 +0200

Hi

I don't really think MLU or no MLU is the mark of a pro or otherwise camera.
Sure, MLU is sometimes nice for certain purposes, but then again I used to
buy cameras only if they had MLU. Then I realised I only ever used MLU in
the studio, and as a photojournalist / stage / corporate photojournalist
type of photographer it was highly unlikely I would ever need it on a camera
except for some studio work. Since then it's just become a non-issue in
deciding what to buy. I mean, my Nikon F2's are still working fine in the
studio, so why would I bother. I think there are different uses for pro
equipment, and for most of mine this particular feature is useless.

Best wishes

Harold

- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
(©¿©)

You can send a short text message to my cellphone by sending e-mail to
0837004303@sms.co.za.
Please ensure that mail sent for this purpose is in plain text only.


My e-mail addresses are as follows:

haroldgess@journalist.com

gess@icon.co.za

Please use either of these to reach me and, lest you lose sight of it, have
a nice day!