Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Paul Chefurka wrote: > > On Sat, 31 Jul 1999 10:51:54 -0400, Paul Schiemer > <schiemer@magicnet.net> wrote: > > >A 645 neg is three times+ the real estate of a 35mm neg.><snip> > Paul Chefurka For me who would love a anything 645 this issue between it and 35 is not grain. For me brownie film is a rubber band that is bigger and thicker than a skinnier and thinner 35mm rubber band. There's more to it and it gets stretched less. I've done much sharper and less grainier images with 35mm slow films on a tripod than hand held TriX Brownie.(MF) (I always think MF stands for something else). Brownie film is richer than 35! That's my word! Brownie=Rich Those little Browies are diving E Types and wearing suede jackets! Mark Rabiner