Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] M4-2
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 16:51:22 -0000

Richard - I'm sure 318 people will leap to correct me, but it seems to me
the general LUG consensus is that if there is an M Dog, it's the M4-2. It's
all relative of course, but the general feeling seems to be that the M4-P is
the more reliable of the two.

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of R. Saylor
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 8:07 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] M4-2


Are there any reliability problems with the M4-2? I don't need/want
the additional framelines of the M4-P.

Thanks,
Richard