Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If it offered advantages I would welcome it. You see, I like change. Hence the reason I use an EOS system instead of an R, or the reason I prefer AF over MF in 35mm SLRs. But I plan on keeping my M3, although there are times..... Peter K - -----Original Message----- From: Ruralmopics@aol.com [mailto:Ruralmopics@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 8:09 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: RE: [Leica] God, no Canon vs. Nikon... I for one am pleased that Nikon never changed their mount. I continue to use an old F2 camera and just recently sold my F. How would you feel if Leica suddenly decided to change the M mount? Bob (some things should never change) McEowen In a message dated 11/30/99 9:02:38 AM, peterk@lucent.com writes: >Not true. Nikon was a larger company than Canon when the AF mounts were > >being changed. Minolta changed theirs, Canon followed, but Nikon opted >to > >be stubborn. Sometimes a bigger company with money does not yield > >foresight. These are the reasons Canon is now a larger company.