Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/11/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 30 Nov 99, Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote, at least in part: > Not true. Nikon was a larger company than Canon when the AF mounts > were being changed. Minolta changed theirs, Canon followed, but > Nikon opted to be stubborn. Sometimes a bigger company with money > does not yield foresight. These are the reasons Canon is now a > larger company. I think Joe meant that the total corporation named Canon was larger, Peter. It still remains so, not? Canon, I'm sure, makes far more on office equipment such as photocopiers etc. than on the optical equipment. - -- Roger Leica Enthusiasts Mailing List http://www.topica.com/lists/leica