Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1999/12/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Rangefinder or SLR?
From: Ruralmopics@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 08:49:44 EST

In a message dated 12/29/99 1:15:33 AM, mrafferty@uswest.net writes:

<< Another advantage Tom might consider is the ability to see the area
outside the frame lines in the viewfinder, especially with the 50 and
90 lenses. You can see a moving object **before** it enters the frame
and shoot accordingly. Works well for timing shots for speedboats,
seeing a pitcher release the ball as you concentrate on the batter,
etc. >>

I don't mean to sound insulting but is this theory or experience speaking? 
Specifically I'm wondering about the speedboats and the batter examples. When 
I shoot a batter I feel like anything less than 300mm is way to little lens 
(even a 400mm is better). I just can't imagine shooting a batter with a 90mm. 
I understand the point the original poster is trying to make. Maybe it's just 
a bad example.

Bob