Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/01/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Not much of an advantage to using HP5 over TX. In short, the players at 400
ASA are
TX - by far the easiest to print (hump at the midtones)
TMY - most dynamic range (15 stops without a shoulder)
Neopan 1600 @ 400 - best shadow detail
In a message dated 12/30/99 10:10:16 PM, Mmermag@aol.com writes:
<< I have been using Tri X and enjoying the results.. however, one of my
printers said I should try Ilford HP5 plus. Any comments or experiences?
Mike
</XMP>
- ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <daemon@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Received: from rly-yd05.mx.aol.com (rly-yd05.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.5]) by
air-yd05.mail.aol.com (v67.7) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:10:16 -0500
Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1])
by rly-yd05.mx.aol.com (v67.7) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:10:00 -0500
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA21098; Thu, 30 Dec 1999
18:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo21.mx.aol.com (imo21.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.65])
by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA21088; Thu, 30
Dec 1999 18:52:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Mmermag@aol.com
Received: from Mmermag@aol.com
by imo21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.6.) id o.0.2dca59f5 (673)
for <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 21:51:45 -0500
(EST)
Message-ID: <0.2dca59f5.259d7441@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 21:51:45 EST
Subject: Re: [Leica] All hail Tri-X
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Netmail sub 2
Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>>